Tuesday, 14 October 2014

Today's Daily Brain Teaser (Oct 15, 2014)

TEGO



Decipher this:



T

E

GO





Check Braingle.com for the answer.





from Braingle's Teasers http://ift.tt/1fYO2jw

via 3d wooden brain teasers from craftypuzzles.com

Russell Brand Peaks On MSNBC, Talking Fox News, The Daily Mail, Hitler, Power And Revolution

Russell Brand's flag of revolution was unfurled on MSNBC on Tuesday, the comedian and activist appearing on The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell to talk socialism, economic elites and Fox News.



The actor and author, who is currently in the US to promote his book Revolution, put in a bravura performance, a turn equally matched by host O’Donnell, with the pair sparring over the comedian’s moreish notion of change in which power is leveraged from politicians and the multinationals they dutifully serve through a process of spiritual collectivism.



Brand also had plenty to say on Fox, an organisation with which the comedian has a long-standing feud. “Bill O’Reilly is a man at war as much with hemorrhoids as with immigrants,” offered Brand, before comparing British and American media.



“British media is more nuanced,” he added, “we have more vitriol in the printed media, newspapers like The Sun… The Daily Mail, which is the Fox News in print – a newspaper that supported Hitler when he was in power and now they get as near as they can, which is the British Conservative Party”.



There was plenty more. Enjoy the clip above...



(Click here to listen to Russell Brand's podcast with Naomi Klein, exclusively shared with the HuffPost UK).



SEE ALSO:































http://ift.tt/eA8V8J



from UK Comedy - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1sJD9t0

Camping Like A Boss

yd2






from You Drive What http://ift.tt/1z8NxOA

via IFTTT

Deadly Combo

yd1






from You Drive What http://ift.tt/1sOnKH5

via IFTTT

A Serbian performance artist assigned a passive role…

marina-abramovich-cropped A Serbian performance artist assigned a passive role to herself, with the public being the force which would act on her. For six hours the artist allowed the audience members to manipulate her body and actions with 72 objects that people were allowed to use (a sign informed them) in any way that they chose.


Some of these were objects that could give pleasure, while others could be wielded to inflict pain, or to harm her. Among them were a rose, a feather, honey, a whip, olive oil, scissors, a scalpel, a gun and a single bullet. For six hours the artist allowed the audience members to manipulate her body and actions.


Initially, members of the audience reacted with caution and modesty, but as time passed (and the artist remained passive) people began to act more aggressively. As Abramović described it later: “What I learned was that… if you leave it up to the audience, they can kill you.” … “I felt really violated: they cut up my clothes, stuck rose thorns in my stomach, one person aimed the gun at my head, and another took it away. It created an aggressive atmosphere. After exactly 6 hours, as planned, I stood up and started walking toward the audience. Everyone ran away, to escape an actual confrontation.”






from Crazy Facts http://ift.tt/1sHAAYo

Kim Jong Un Returns From 'Martial Arts Training And Meditating Atop Mount Paektu'

The Flaws in Writing Flawed Women: From 'Gone Girl' to 'Miranda'

*THIS POST CONTAINS SPOILERS*



When I publish my novel, Lassie Gone Bad, I hope I won't be accused of doggie prejudice. Will I offend animal lovers by creating a dog who bites, leaves a mess on the bed and is unhealthily obsessed with sticks?



I jest of course (though I do like that title) I refer - admittedly rather crudely - to the attacks in the media on Gillian Flynn's Gone Girl. For those of you who haven't read it/ seen the film, Amy Dunne *spoiler alert* is self-serving, manipulative, vindictive and murderous (and also makes a false allegation of rape and tricks her husband into getting her pregnant) In short, she's a misogynist's wet dream.



I find such criticisms exasperating. Countless novels feature flawed, weak men or flawed, brutish ones. No one would argue such books are prejudicial to men or that the authors in question were aiming to slag off the entire male population. But the moment women are portrayed as complex and flawed there is a big debate on whether they are complex and flawed in the right way.



I recently wrote a comedy show that premiered at The Gilded Balloon about a girl who is gullible, awkward, and a chronic people-pleaser. Most of feedback was positive but one woman protested that, "as someone who can really write, shouldn't I be presenting women in a better light? Make her a bit stronger?" while a friend lamented that my character was submissively being pushed around by men (actually she mainly gets pushed around by another woman, but I digress.)



Comedy is supposed to be about presenting people's flaws. It's reassuring. It makes us laugh with relief. Just as in a thriller you don't want your characters straightforward and honest, in a comedy you don't want them confident and selfless (as anyone who had the misfortune of catching Soul Man - starring Dan Ackroyd as a saintly vicar will attest.)



I proudly call myself a feminist, and I am glad the movement has become so popular. But I find it exhausting that you still can't write a flawed female character without people getting up in arms that you are damaging the movement. As Gillian Flynn herself says, "For me (feminism) is also the ability to have women who are bad characters... the one thing that really frustrates me is this idea that women are innately good, innately nurturing. In literature, they can be dismissably bad - trampy, vampy, bitchy types - but there's still a big push back against the idea that women can be just pragmatically evil, bad and selfish... I don't write psycho bitches. The psycho bitch is just crazy - she has no motive, and so she's a dismissible person because of her psycho-bitchiness."



As someone who is sat through too many thrillers with exciting men but anodyne and uninteresting women, and comedies with sarcastic, 'grown-up' women used as foil to lovable flawed men, I think we are crying out for more variety. These women (such as in the ghastly Grown Ups 2) roll their eyes and go "oh those men! They are so annoying yet great!" They offered wise platitudes and nodded their heads in a knowing way. They don't do much else. WHO ARE THESE WOMEN? I've never known any women like that apart from my Year seven maths teacher.



More ridiculous were the claims last year that Miranda was misogynistic. Now Miranda may not be everyone's cup of tea, but is it really misogynistic? Really?! Because she's clumsy? Wasn't Mr Bean clumsy? I didn't see any journalist adopting an earnest tone to claim the Mr Bean was bad for men's image. What is wrong with showing that women like men can be childish, clumsy and indecisive? Or in the case of Gone Girl, that female psychopaths can be just as dangerous as their male counterparts. Can't we be a bit more inclusive? Can't we have a range of different women in TV like we have a range of different men?



There remains a very prescriptive idea of how we should portray women in fiction, and it is not doing any of us any favours. I am not sure the world is ready for Lassie Gone Bad, which is a pity as I bet it would be a lot racier than Lassie Come Home.



Rosie will be performing her show Fall Girl at The Canal Café Theatre October 27-29. To find out more about the show or to book tickets, go to http://ift.tt/1cM6Enc http://ift.tt/eA8V8J



from UK Comedy - The Huffington Post http://ift.tt/1wA7eJr